Research paper topics, free example research papers

You are welcome to search thousands of free research papers and essays. Search for your research paper topic now!

Research paper example essay prompt: The Summary Of Getting Past No - 1145 words

NOTE: The samle research paper or essay prompt you see on this page is a free essay, available to anyone. You can use any paper as a sample on how to write research paper, essay prompts or as a source of information. We strongly discourage you to directly copy/paste any essay and turn it in for credit. If your school uses any plagiarism detecting software, you might be caught and accused of plagiarism. If you need a custom essay or research paper, written from scratch exclusively for you, please use our paid research paper writing service!

The summary of "Getting Past No" (0) Introduction Each of us has to face tough negotiation with an irritable spouse, an ornery boss, a rigid salesperson, or a tricky customer. Under stress, even kind, reasonable people turn into angry, intractable opponents. In order to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement in an efficient and amicable fashion, this book introduces us the strategy of breakthrough negotiation. The breakthrough strategy is counterintuitive: it requires us to do the opposite of what we might naturally do in difficult situations. In addition, the essence of the breakthrough strategy is indirect action.

Rather than trying to break down opponent's resistance, we make it easier for him to break through it themselves. In short, breakthrough negotiation is the art of letting the other person have our ways. (1) STEP ONE: Don't React Go To The Balcony The first step we need to do in dealing with a difficult person is not to control his behavior but to control our own. Because when we react-act without thinking, we usually neglect our interests. "Going to the balcony" means distancing ourselves from our natural impulses and emotions. From the balcony we can calmly evaluate the conflict, think constructively for both sides, and look for a mutually satisfactory way to resolve the problem. One the balcony, the first thing we need to do is figure out our interests.

We also need to identify our BATNA- our Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement. The agreement must satisfy our interests better than our BATNA could. Our BATNA should be our measuring stick for evaluating any potential agreement. Often we do not even realize we are reacting, because we are too enmeshed in the situation. Therefore, we need to recognize the tactic.

Make a mental note when we detect a possible trick or subtle attack. By naming the game, we are able to neutralize it easily. Once we have named the game and stop our immediate reaction, the next step is to buy ourselves time to think-time to go to the balcony. Use the time to keep our eyes on the prize-an agreement that satisfies your interests, certainly better than our BATNA can. Instead of getting mad or getting even, concentrate on getting what we want.

This is what going to the balcony is all about. (2) STEP TWO: Disarm Them Step To Their Side Before we can discuss the problem with the opponent, we need to disarm him. The secret of disarming is surprise. To disarm our opponent, we need to do the opposite of what he expects: step to his side, listen to him, acknowledge his point, and agree wherever we can. Listening requires patience and self- discipline. Instead of reacting immediately or plotting our next step, we have to remain focused on what our counterpart is saying.

Listening gives us a chance to engage him in a cooperative task-that of understanding his problem. It makes him more willing to listen to us. After listening to our opponent, the next step is to acknowledge his point. Acknowledging the opponent's point does not mean that we agree with it. It means that we accept it as one valid point of view among others. The next step is to agree wherever we can.

It is hard to attack someone who agrees with us. (3) STEP THREE: Don't Reject Reframe Instead of rejecting our opponent's position, we need to direct his attention to the problem of meeting each side's interests. Reframing works because every message is subject to interpretation. It means putting a problem-solving frame around our opponent's positional statements. A problem-solving question focuses attention on the interests of each side, the options for satisfying them, and the standards of fairness for resolving differences.

Rather than trying to teach him ourselves, let the problem be his teacher. (4) STEP FOUR: Make It Easy To Say Yes Build Them A Golden Bridge At last we are ready to negotiate; however, our opponent may stall. Instead of pushing our opponent toward an agreement, we need to do the opposite. Our job is to build a golden bridge across the chasm. Building a golden bridge means making it easier for our opponent to overcome the four common obstacles to agreement: it means actively involving him in devising a solution so that it becomes his idea, not just ours; it means satisfying his unmet interests; it means helping him save face; it means making the process of negotiation as easy as possible.

(5) STEP FIVE: Make It Hard To Say No Bring Them To Their Senses, Not Their Knees Once our opponent still resists and thinks he can win without negotiation, our natural temptation is to abandon the problem-solving game and turn it to the power game. However, unless we have a decisive power advantage, the opponent usually resist and fight back. Even if we win the battle, we may lose the war. In the process we may destroy our relation with our opponent. And he will often find a way to renege or retaliate the next time he is in a better power position.

Overcoming the power paradox means making it easier for our opponent to say yes at the same time that we make it harder for him to say no. We should treat the exercise of power as an integral part of the problem-solving negotiation. Instead of seeking victory, we should aim for mutual satisfaction. We should use power to "educate" our opponent. We need to convince him that he is wrong.

We could ask him reality-testing questions designed to get him to think through the impact of not reaching agreement. Than the next step is to use a direct statement of what will happen-a warning. However, we need to be careful not to threaten the opponent. If our opponent ignores our warning, we will need to take the next step: demonstrate our BATNA. Use it only if necessary and minimize his resistance by exercising restraint and reassuring him that our goal is mutual satisfaction, not victory.

We need to remind our opponent continually that the golden bridge is always open to him. (6) When I confront with difficult people, I intend to stop communication with them. Because I think it is useless and time-wasting to negotiate with an irrational person. However, I am also damaged by doing so because it is impossible to refuse anyone whom I do not like to talk to. It seems that I always react immediately and adopt the BATNA that is described in the book.

After reading this book, I realize that it is possible to remove obstacle in the negotiation and achieve the win-win results. Even drive a bargain with a car dealer, I could use strategies taught by the book, too. Negotiation is the art. I seldom notice that before. This book provides me the practicable strategies and sharp examples that will help me to improve my relationship with others.

Related: summary, difficult people, point of view, problem solving, harder

Research paper topics, free essay prompts, sample research papers on The Summary Of Getting Past No