Research paper topics, free example research papers
You are welcome to search thousands of free research papers and essays. Search for your research paper topic now!
Research paper example essay prompt: How The Government May Have Created Aids - 4554 words
NOTE: The samle research paper or essay prompt you see on this page is a free essay, available to anyone. You can use any paper as a sample on how to write research paper, essay prompts or as a source of information. We strongly discourage you to directly copy/paste any essay and turn it in for credit. If your school uses any plagiarism detecting software, you might be caught and accused of plagiarism. If you need a custom essay or research paper, written from scratch exclusively for you, please use our paid research paper writing service!
How the Government May Have Created AIDS The following is a complete verbatim transcription from a recent broadcast of "Network 23", a program shown on a local Los Angeles Public Access Cable Channel. FULL TRANSCRIPTION FROM NETWORK 23: Good evening, I'm Michel Kassett. This is Network 23. A couple of weeks ago we had a program on the subject of AIDS, addressing the question of whether AIDS -- the AIDS virus -- was created by the government; and I'm sure that some people were quite shocked by what they heard. We spent that entire program relating to you the evidence of a very substantial amount of factual evidence which supports the proposition that AIDS is a synthetic biological agent that was deliberately engineered by the US government as an instrument of depopulation.
This is by far the most controversial and dangerous subject that we have ever addressed on this program, so I would like to review briefly the major points -- the most significant pieces of evidence -- that I presented two weeks ago. The first point was that in the early 1970's, Henry Kissinger wrote a top secret document -- a National Security Memorandum ("NSM 200") -- in which he indicated that "depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World." This Memorandum which can be obtained from the US National Archives, which was only declassified very quietly in 1990, was adopted by the National Security Council as official US foreign policy towards the Third World. Now, this is a classic example of the "secret government" in action, because of none of this was known to the Congress, and certainly, it was not known to the American people. Did any of you know that depopulation was considered a matter of US national security? Did any of you know that for the past 20 years, depopulation has been the highest long-range priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World? No you didn't, because it was classified -- it was a secret. I would like to read for you just a piece of this document.
It is written by Henry Kissinger: "Reduction of the rate of population in these States is a matter of vital US national security." [National Security Memorandum, Henry Kissinger] And we even have a map of those areas in which Kissinger indicates where depopulation would be desireable. It's all Third World countries -- it's all brown people and yellow people, of course. "The US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries. That fact gives the US enhanced interests in the political, economic and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of the United States." [National Security Memorandum, Henry Kissinger] Now, when Kissinger says "economic interests of the United States.." he means the interests of US corporations, which are in fact, multi-national corporations, with no loyalty to this country whatsoever.
NSM 200, unlike other government documents on the subject, outlined "international and political and economic implications of population growth.." rather than its ecological or sociological aspects. Like we have been saying all along, the New World Order is a business, and the US Government is in the business of business. Now, the next document was from the US Senate Library. It is a record of the Appropriations Hearing that was held in July of 1969, where the Department of the Army specifically requested and received $10 million to develop "a synthetic biological agent that would impair or destroy the human immune system." This is from the US Senate Library. We also made reference to several published articles from the World Health Organization, written about the same time, which advocated similar kinds of research toward the development of "a hybrid virus that could selectively effect the human immune system." Like it not, these documents all exist. The Kissinger Memorandum, the Army Appropriations Hearing, the articles from the World Health Organization; these are official records -- facts of history -- that can not be disputed.
We also pointed out an incredible coincidence. The World Health Organization went into Central Africa in 1972 -- into an area that is known as the "AIDS Belt" -- and administered a smallpox vaccination to several thousands of Africans. This event was followed immediately by the first outbreak of AIDS on this planet -- a remarkable coincidence -- that was noted as a Front Page Headline in the London Times, but has never even been mentioned in the US Media -- never even mentioned. Another startling fact that was never mentioned in the mainstream media -- the Hepatitis B Vaccine that was given to several thousand male homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978. The fact is, every single person who received that vaccine contracted AIDS -- every single one of them -- without exception. That is what the first American victims of AIDS all had in common.
They were receivers of the Hepatitis B Vaccine. It is a document fact. AIDS began in America in 1978 in the homosexual communities of New York and San Francisco, immediately following a government-sponsored program of Hepatitis B Vaccinations. This is all completely documented -- it is completely true. In our first program, we made many references to material that you can and should read, such as the Strecker Memorandum, by Dr.
Robert Strecker. Another work called "Who Murdered Africa," by Dr. William Douglas. And an incredible book called "A Higher Form of Killing," which documents over 500 specific cases of biological experimentation by our government on an unsuspecting public. If you don't think they do "that kind of thing," you are simply uninformed. We also read you an official government report from the Royal Society of Medicine in Great Britain, in which they state unequivocally that "saliva and blood are vastly more infectious than genital secretions," and "that AIDS meets none of the criterion of a venereal disease. That despite the misrepresentations of the American Medical Establishment and the American Government, AIDS is not primarily a sexually transmitted disease." All of that, according to the Royal Society of Medicine in Great Britain.
That's a document that we have and we'll come back to it in just a moment. We also shared with you information and opinions from many highly-respected physicians, like Dr. Robert Strecker, Dr. William Douglas, Dr. Cantwell, Dr. Hazeltine, Dr.
Alonso, who all agree that the AIDS virus could never have occurred spontaneously in Nature. That animal viruses cannot jump species, as we are being told they did, as we are being asked to believe happened -- when allegedly, a green monkey bit an Africa and precipitated the pandemic of AIDS. We know as a scientific fact that viruses cannot jump species, unless they are specifically engineered to do so. And we also know for a scientific fact that the AIDS virus bears no resemblance whatsoever to any virus ever found in a green monkey, but does bear a total resemblance to cow virus and sheep virus, which have somehow been bonded together. The only possible way these two different species of virus could bond together would be in a laboratory -- something engineered in a laboratory -- and then further engineered to make the jump into a human system. We talked about the Laws of Virology, which state that for every case of infection -- viral infection -- that is known and reported, there are 99 cases that are unknown and unreported.
This means that if we have 200,000 known cases of AIDS, then there are 20 million right behind it. 20 million Americans who are HIV positive and do not know it. We also shared quotes from several doctors who believe that the HIV infection rate has now reached approximately 100 million people on the Continent of Africa; 30 to 50 million in Asia; and no less than 20 million in the United States. Again, the Laws of Virology state that the rate of infection for a retrovirus, like the AIDS virus, the rate of infection will double approximately every 12 months. Another frightening fact that no one has bothered to tell us, is that there are six different basic types of the AIDS virus, and that each of these basic types, being what is called a "recombinant retrovirus," has a recombinant potential of 9,000 to the Fourth Power.
"Recombinant" means the ability to change and recombine into something new, and the calculation 9,000 to the Fourth Power times 6 is literally in the hundreds of millions of trillions of different possible forms and manifestations of the AIDS virus. [Note, the number calculated is 354,294,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 variations of the AIDS virus]. Now that means that you would need a vaccine for every possible choice that the virus could make, which is technically impossible; truthfully, realistically impossible. It's like the influenza virus -- there's no vaccine. There are simply too many strains of it, too many different varieties, to ever develop a single, comprehensive vaccine.
The bottom line? We are not being told the truth about this plague. In the words of Dr. Hazeltine in his testimony to Congress: "AIDS is a species threatening disease." Now, I don't want to appear to bleak or too hopeless. All of these doctors believe that some type of cure is possible, but that we're going to need a lot more money, and we're going to have to move beyond the strangle hold of the Medical Establishment -- the AMA. And since he lives here in Los Angeles, I'm now going to put the number of Dr.
Robert Strecker up on the screen -- I'm going to flash that number for you now. Please put that up, thank you. [213 344-8039]. I urge you to write down this number and to make this call. Please call Dr.
Strecker. All you have to do is call, and he will send you information -- important critical information -- on the subject of AIDS. Alright. About 3 weeks ago we played an excerpt from a speech by Craig Hulet, and tonight I want to play you something else from that speech which relates to the subject of AIDS. For those who do not know him, Craig Hulet was a former advisor to the National Security Council and a former consultant to several multi-national corporations, and he has, as they say; "come in from the cold.." -- he has crossed over and has spent the last 3 or 4 years writing and lecturing on the subject of the New World Order - sharing with everyone who will listen, the breadth and the scope of his knowledge and experience. Mr.
Hulet knows first-hand the kind of men who are running the world. He knows what they're up to and he is trying to warn us. Now, on this list of alternative sources of information, which so many people are writing in to receive -- you know all you have to do is send in a stamped, self-addressed envelope, and we'll send you one -- the name at the top of this list is Craig Hulet. He is an indispensable connection. So, right now I want to play for you a small excerpt from a speech that he gave on July 25th at the Hilton Hotel in Los Angeles. His subject was George Bush and the New World Order, but at the end of the evening, he was asked a specific question about AIDS, and this is how he responded: ".. biological warfare virus by the US Military. Sure..
I really hate that subject. You know, we're never, ever going to be able to prove -- Strecker, William Douglas -- we'll never be able to prove that AIDS was developed specifically to reduce the populations of Central Africa, the black inner cities, drug users, prostitutes and homosexuals. But it just seems strange to me that all through the 1960's and 1970's, there were books published; [the] Global 2000 Report to the President, [the] the Club of Rome wrote a book on over-population -- I must have 50 books on over-population and the need to get rid of a certain large amount of people on the planet. Now, they never say which people out to be gotten rid of, but it seems a major coincidence that the same people that are starving in Ethiopia, in the Sudan, are the same people that getting AIDS and dying. By the year 2000, they expect 60 million blacks in Central Africa to die of AIDS.
60 million! It could be as many as 20 million in America. Homosexuals, predominantly, and the interesting thing is, it is not a homosexual disease. It IS a man-made, mutated disease. It had to have been man-made. Sheep do not get together and do chemical experiments on their viruses.
So, a man had to graft this bovine virus, which they know that's what it is, onto a human cell. It had to be made. So we know its man-made. They know it's transmitted with the.. because they know the most effective device..
the best test to discover if you have AIDS.. is not a blood test, it's a saliva test. Now why haven't they told us that?" "It's not a sexually transmitted disease, it's simply a disease that gets transmitted. And you can transmit it by sneezing on someone. Why don't they tell us that? In the Congressional Record, it says that it can be transmitted "effectively" by mosquitos.
It says so. The Center for Disease Control, in the Congressional Record, says that it is transmitted by mosquitos in Belgrade, Florida -- they know it for a fact. Why haven't they told us that AIDS is being transmitted by mosquitos? They say it to themselves in the Congressional Record, why don't they tell us?" "OK. Here's my theory. Whether or not [AIDS] was created for the purpose of exterminating the very same, coincidentally, same anti-social element that the men I did business with for 15 or 20 years, though ought to be gotten rid of anyways; homosexuals, prostitutes, blacks, etc., and of course, the Black Continent -- they want the resources but they certainly don't want to feed the people, see? Why is that they are allowing all of these myths to be told -- the destruction to take place, and they're doing nothing to stop it? Here's my theory, and this is all it is -- is a theory -- that they'll find a cure when about 1 billion people on this planet have died from AIDS, starvation and disease -- all over the world, all of sudden Eli Lilly, who is one of the major corporations doing AIDS research -- and coincidentally, George Bush on the Board of Eli Lilly -- when they finally eliminate huge sections of the population, which is what they always wanted throughout the 1960's and 1970's, because of over-population -- it's called "mitigating the problem." They feel that AIDS and famine and disease will mitigate the problem of over-population.
I suspect that around the year 2010 or so, all of a sudden Eli Lilly will announce that they've found a phenomenal cure for AIDS, but not until a lot people die. Because like I said, it seems a major coincidence to me that the very same people that the men I did business with for years, dislike the most, those people who just happen to be the ones that are contracting AIDS -- happens to be some of the ones that are dying in famines, pestilence and bombing into the Stone Age like we just did -- I don't believe in the "Coincidence Theory of History" -- I just don't. I haven't for a long time because the CIA, the National Security Council is too brilliantly planned. They plan everything to the most minute detail. I can't believe that all of this is a coincidence.
That's all I can say though." "I'm going to do a White Paper on that one of these days. One of the reasons I haven't is that if you talk about AIDS, you never get invited on the university campus -- you follow me? So I never address AIDS.. for 4 years I've had material on AIDS that addresses this in some fundamental way, and some of it was very good documentation, proving some of the things that I just said, but I have never discussed it because of you discuss AIDS, I guarantee you, you will never be a speaker on the university campuses." [Craig Hulet] Once again, I want to say that even though it may not be proved in any "absolute" sense, because absolute proof is impossible in a relative universe, and that's one of the tricks of the cynic or the skeptic, is that they demand absolute proof, knowing full well there is no such thing as absolute proof, there is only evidence, and a certain point you make a decision on the basis of the evidence -- you make a decision which becomes your belief -- on the basis of the evidence. So, on the basis of the evidence, it is my belief, it is my conviction at a very deep level, that AIDS was deliberately created and implemented by the United States Government -- more specifically by certain individuals, most notably Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft and George Herbert Walker Bush, who was the Director of the CIA at that time, when the Kissinger Memorandum was adopted by the National Security Council. I can't prove it absolutely, by I personally believe that Bush was deeply involved -- a major player -- particularly in the implementation of this epidemic.
There's an article in the LA Times yesterday that says "Bush Defends AIDS Budget" and "urges behavioral changes." There was a protest demonstration in Kennebunkport, Maine -- the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power marched through the tiny downtown area of Kennebunkport. Bush criticized the gay activists for "hurting holiday business" in this picturesque New England resort, for "hurting holiday business." Quote (this is Bush talking); "To the degree the message hits some merchant in Kennebunkport, on the best weekend possible, and caused them to close their doors, I got that part of it, and I didn't like it." This is one cold reptile. He goes on to say; "You know why they were here. I know why they were here. They were here because you all are here," said the President to the White House Press Corp.
"They were here because they can get television coverage, and to some degree, print coverage, because the President happened to be at home." You see, he is contemptuous, he is contemptuous of the people that have this disease. A spokesperson for the demonstrators said that most of Bush's AIDS policy has gone into research on AZT, a drug that they said, at best, can only slow the progression of the disease. It's like junk food for viruses. As Hulet just said, they don't want to stop it, it's "mitigating the problem," it's getting rid of the undesirables. When asked what he thought should be done about the AIDS crisis, Bush said; "I'm in favor of behavioral change." Now what is the subtext? What is he saying? He's speaking to his 80% constituency, telling them what they want to hear, and he is saying basically that AIDS is caused by immoral behavior, immoral sexual behavior or immoral drug use.
He knows that's a lie, but he is a liar, so what do you expect. He's the master of deception. He was in on it, I have no doubt whatsoever. We said we were going to return this document. This is the House of Common Social Services Committee, and this is a document prepared by the Royal Society of Medicine.
You can not get more official than this in Great Britain. And this is what they say: "The scale of the deceptions and misinformation perpetrated by virologists, clinicians and editors of scientific and medical journals about the infectivity of genital secretions, compared with that of blood and saliva, has been astonishing. In the presence of a new, lethal virus, spreading amongst people, for which no vaccine or cure is in sight, every person would assume that scientists have been working day and night to verify how it is transmitted. On the contrary, having assumed for a variety of motives that AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease like syphilis or gonorrhea, a negligible research effort has gone into the critical matter of transmission. A few preliminary papers were published and their findings have been repeatedly quoted as showing the opposite of what they actually showed. When this was pointed out in letters to the editors of American medical and scientific journals, publication has been refused. No attempt has been made to check or double-check the findings in other laboratories, or to rectify published errors." "As far as it goes, the tiny research effort into infectivity of bodily fluids indicates that saliva is far more infectious than genital secretions, but that blood is vastly more infectious than either.
Consequently, the idea that condoms can have any significant effect on the spread of AIDS in a nation is utterly preposterous." This is the Royal Society of Medicine in Great Britain. I'll continue.. "Governments all over the world are spending millions of pounds [dollars], advising their citizens to prevent AIDS by using condoms on the basis of MANIFESTLY FRAUDULENT misrepresentation of scientific evidence." You know, if they're going to spend millions of your tax dollars on televised warnings, don't you think they ought to include cuts and wounds and saliva and breathing it into the lungs, which apparently happens -- 16,000 health care workers are infected by AIDS. Ask them. Ask the ones who believe their superiors at the AMA about the costs of ignorance. You want the truth about AIDS? Get outside the American Blackout. Get outside the boundaries of the so-called "freest nation on Earth." Back in the 1960's you know, we used to feel sorry for the Russian people, because we knew they weren't getting the whole picture.
We wondered what that must be like. My god, it was hard to imagine. Well, now we know. Now we know exactly what it's like, to live in a society where crucial information -- information critical to our survival is being controlled and suppressed by the government. The bottom line? Very serious bad guys are in control of your planet. And the name at the top of the list is George Bush.
George Herbert Walker Bush, Emperor of the Earth and Supreme Commander of the Dark Side of the Force. Well, we're out of time. Good night. I hope to see you all again next week. If I don't, you will certainly know why." END OF TRANSCRIPTION OF NETWORK 23 PROGRAM.
The following is a transcript of the DOD1970 appropriations report mentioned above.. ================================================== ==================== DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970 ================================================== ==================== UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ------ SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman ROBERT L. F. SIKES, Florida GLENARD P LIPSCOMB, California JAMIE D. WHITTEN, Mississippi WILLIAM E. MINSHALL, Ohio GEORGE W. ANDREWS, Alabama JOHN J.
RHODES, Arizona DANIEL J. FLOOD, Pennsylvania GLENN R. DAVIS, Wisconsin JOHN M. SLACK, West Virginia JOSEPH P. ADDABBO, New York FRANK E. EVANS, Colorado ------ PART 5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ------ PAGE 129 TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969 SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention.
One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. Mr. Sikes. Are we doing any work in that field? Dr.
MacArthur. We are not. Mr. Sikes. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest? Dr. MacArthur. Certainly not lack of interest.
Mr. Sikes. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved? Dr. MacArthur. We will be very happy to. (The information follows:) The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare.
A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations: 1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occuring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughtout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. 2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million. 4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science.
There are not many highly competent scientists in the field, almost all are in univerity laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other that DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program. ================================================== =========================== In 1970, they were given their ten million dollars. ================================================== =========================== The following is a listing of the references used by Dr. Strecker in his video "The Strecker Memorandum".
It also contains the text printed on the outside of the video box. VIDEO BOX CONTAINER =================== The Strecker Memorandum With no cure and no effective treatment in sight, by the year 2000 A.D. everyone in the U.S. will be infected with AIDS. This videotape presents the chilling conclusion of 5 years of exhaustive research by Dr.
Robert B. Strecker M.D., Ph.D. This is the most controversial videotape you'll ever see. Dr. Robert Strecker refutes, with documented evidence, virtually everything the so-called experts and Government reports have told you about AIDS. He asserts in no uncertain terms that: AIDS is a MANMADE disease..
AIDS is NOT a homosexual disease.. AIDS is NOT a vernereal disease.. AIDS is can be carried by mosquitos Condoms will NOT prevent AIDS.. There can never be a vaccine ...
Research paper topics, free essay prompts, sample research papers on How The Government May Have Created Aids